The rise of AI and its insatiable demand for energy couldn’t have come at a greater time for the nuclear industry.
After many years of stagnation within the West, this 12 months saw a surge in demand for nuclear power plants from so-called hyperscale tech corporations Google, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft, which require huge amounts of low-carbon electricity across the clock to run their data centers and win what considered one of the businesses internally calls “the AI ​​war.”
Some of the world's largest banks also championed the industry at a climate event in New York last week, publicly demonstrating their support for a sector that sells itself as a key a part of the clean energy transition.
“AI data centers might be built next to energy production sites that may constantly produce low-cost, low-emission electricity on a gigawatt scale. “Basically next to nuclear power plants,” he said Yann LeCun, chief AI scientist at Meta, on X.
“The appetite is great. There is a limit to what we will say, you’ll be able to read between the lines with any hyperscaler, there’s an appetite,” said Chris Rees, energy strategy manager at Meta.
The excitement within the nuclear industry is palpable. While nuclear reactors have been built diligently in China and South Korea in recent many years, there was a major decline within the USA and Europe.
After a wave of nuclear power plants were in-built the Nineteen Seventies and Eighties, the U.S has only built three latest reactors for the reason that mid-Ninetieswith the industry affected by severe cost overruns.
Accidents at Three Mile Island in 1979, Chernobyl in 1986 and the earthquake and tsunami that struck the Fukushima power plant in 2011 have also sparked public antipathy toward the technology.
Last month, Microsoft announced it will restart the decommissioned Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania, nuclear power plant, while Amazon paid $650 million in March to construct a knowledge center next to the Susquehanna Steam Electric nuclear power plant, also in Pennsylvania.
The higher prices that technology corporations are willing to pay could also trigger a wave of investment in latest nuclear power plants, investors say.
“We are seeing price points out there that justify latest construction,” said Arthur Hyde of Segra Capital, a hedge fund that has invested in the availability chain of uranium, the metal utilized in most nuclear power plants.
“You have government commitments to speculate in latest nuclear power plants, you could have financial commitments to support them and we all know the demand situation is there. These are the commitments it is advisable green light latest nuclear capability within the US and Europe. For the primary time we see all of those components together.
“I'm pretty optimistic that we'll see announcements about latest nuclear capability within the United States in the subsequent 12 months,” he added.
But behind the hype there remain structural challenges, including the crucial query of who might be willing to tackle the high risk of nuclear projects that may go years over schedule and billions over budget.
“Tech corporations will want nothing to do with owning a nuclear facility. If they do, they've lost their minds. “That’s not what they’re within the business for,” said a knowledge center and nuclear insider at considered one of the three biggest tech corporations.
At a nuclear industry dinner ahead of New York Climate Week, Caroline Golin, head of energy market development at Google, warned that technology corporations couldn’t be expected to assume all project risk, in line with two people in attendance.
Todd Noe, director of nuclear energy at Microsoft, said on the World Nuclear Symposium in London last month that probably the most technology corporations can be willing to support latest nuclear power plants can be to supply long-term contracts at good prices for the electricity.
That is probably not enough. “They check with us, they check with nuclear technology providers, they check with utilities, but they don’t wish to construct, own and operate their very own nuclear reactors, they wish to be the top users,” Ahmet Tokpinar said. the overall manager of the nuclear energy business at US engineering giant Bechtel.
“They are willing to supply long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs), even at a premium. This is great, nevertheless it doesn't help with frontend development. “Whose capital will help cover the danger?” he said.
PPAs are long-term agreements to buy energy at a predetermined price. However, they don’t cover cost overruns or delays that will arise on a project.
Tokpinar added that while he was aware that there had been some discussions about technology corporations investing capital in projects, he said none of those had moved forward.
“In order for (latest power plants) to be realized, they must intervene on a big scale. I can't see anyone. They have the means to do it, they’ve the capital to do it. Whether they’ll justify that to their shareholders is a mystery to me.”
Microsoft, Amazon and Google all declined to comment on their nuclear strategy.
The tech corporations and the nuclear corporations are attempting to search out a formula that works for them, with the banks advising each.
“It wouldn’t surprise me an excessive amount of if the landscape of those extremely complex projects required some changes to the best way the PPA works,” said Peter Freed, former director of energy strategy at Meta.
He suggested setting the ultimate price tech corporations pay for his or her energy at a later date after the unique deal to soak up any overruns attributable to construction. “You show that there’s demand, after which the worth isn’t set until you progress forward,” he said.
“The debate is that this requires a brand new market structure that doesn't currently exist,” one financier said on the climate event in New York, adding: “The low-hanging fruit of all these hyperscalers is to take a look at existing reactors.”
But he warned that tech corporations would face a political backlash in the event that they began taking large amounts of low-carbon nuclear power offline.
“Pennsylvania’s clean energy is 88 percent nuclear. “If you begin taking away the nuclear power plants, it really puts their ability to fulfill net zero targets in danger,” he noted.
Tony Grayson, general manager at Compass Quantum and a former U.S. Navy nuclear submarine captain who later helped construct Oracle's data center business, said technology corporations could provide subsidies for brand spanking new projects, getting into the role of governments played traditionally. They could also offer low-cost electricity to local communities to handle objections to latest nuclear projects.
But he cautioned the nuclear industry against excessive hype, noting that projects are typically measured in many years and that technology can change quickly and radically.
“In data centers, you make your money by attending to market quickly. Nuclear power doesn’t mean rapid time to market,” he said. “I’m an enormous supporter of nuclear power, but we just have to take a deep breath and realize that something like this isn’t going to occur anytime soon.”
Climate capital
Where climate change meets the economy, markets and politics. Discover the FT's coverage here.
Are you interested by the FT's environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based goals here
