Unlock Editor's Digest without spending a dime
Roula Khalaf, editor of the FT, picks her favorite stories on this weekly newsletter.
Artificial intelligence represents perhaps the largest technological opportunity because the advent of the Internet, however it also raises fundamental questions on how a number of the industry's strongest firms earn a living.
Apple, which began rolling out Apple Intelligence last month, appears to be as well positioned for the AI ​​age as anyone. In this area, context is every thing. The data Apple has about its users puts the corporate in a powerful position.
But the corporate has yet to point out how adding AI to its devices can meaningfully change people's lives — or prove that it could actually find latest ways to earn a living from a technology that doesn't fit neatly into its old business model.
Reports this week that Apple is preparing to make use of AI in a brand new attack on the smart home are the most recent sign that the technology could boost some existing tech markets. However, it’s unclear whether this can even increase the corporate's profits.
The latest smart home push is more likely to are available in two parts. Next yr, loudly a report Bloomberg is launching a six-inch wall-mounted Apple screen that acts as a “hub” for controlling devices throughout the house. The following yr, accordingly a respected supply chain analyst, will launch Apple-branded home security cameras.
This can be Apple's most significant move into the smart home market because it introduced HomeKit – software to manage gadgets across the home via Apple devices – a decade ago. It would also show that Apple desires to equip your property with more of its own hardware, somewhat than simply providing you with the flexibility to attach devices from other manufacturers.
The first wave of smart home technology was disappointing. The smart home turned out to be not that smart in any respect. Speakers like Amazon's Alexa-powered Echo and Apple's HomePod achieved only poor language understanding. Customers also found it difficult to establish and manage the device networks that might help them control the speakers.
Like its primary competitors, Apple is now betting that generative AI can breathe latest life into this market. If the devices in your property could detect who’s in a room or what is happening, they usually tend to have the ability to reply in a meaningful way.
Apple is well behind Amazon and Google, which already sell an entire range of home gadgets. But it has some strong attributes, including a fame for privacy and a track record of seamless integration. Plus, unlike Amazon's Alexa, Apple devices are unlikely to interrupt your private life with random offers of things it is advisable to buy.
The acid test shall be whether Apple can use AI in a way that individuals actually find useful. The first version of Apple Intelligence relies heavily on a feature called App Intents. This allows developers to “open” their apps to Apple’s Siri assistant, essentially allowing the AI ​​to mechanically perform functions throughout the apps on a user’s behalf.
Are you hungry but unsure what to eat? Just ask the Apple hub on the wall or kitchen counter and it would recommend takeout and direct Uber Eats to put the order. As at all times with AI, the chances are easy to assume, but reality often falls short.
It can be unclear whether this may turn out to be a big business for Apple. Loyal Apple customers should pay some type of premium for gadgets that fit seamlessly into their Apple-centric digital worlds. However, it could actually be difficult to attain much differentiation with devices which are plugged into the wall somewhere and are rarely noticed. As the FT reported last week, Apple has just added a brand new warning to its official filings that its future services and products may never generate as much revenue or be as profitable as old hits just like the iPhone.
Apple also needs to point out how it could actually use AI to extend its services revenue, which has turn out to be the primary reason for its slower growth. As devices across the home manage increasingly parts of individuals's lives, customers will have to be convinced to pay for brand spanking new kinds of services which are currently hard to assume.
Today there are only initial indications of what that may appear like. For example, a premium subscription to iCloud+ includes the flexibility to upload and manage encrypted videos from HomeKit devices to Apple's cloud.
Whether it could actually make features like these increasingly useful and eventually turn them into premium services in their very own right shall be the final word test of Apple's success in AI.
