Unlock Editor's Digest totally free
Roula Khalaf, editor of the FT, picks her favorite stories on this weekly newsletter.
The history of quantum computing has been marked by a series of breakthroughs on the frontiers of materials and computer science. The application of the principles of quantum mechanics to construct computers that enable almost unimaginable leaps in performance in comparison with today's machines has occupied scientists for greater than 40 years. Nevertheless, practical quantum computers remain tantalizingly out of reach. News of a breakthrough this week suggests the finish line may finally be in sight, potentially paving the option to the primary practical machines across the turn of the last decade.
Google announced that for the primary time it has managed to beat the inherent instability of a quantum system and successfully combat the incoherence or “noise” that typically overwhelms machines when performing larger calculations. Like the primary controlled nuclear chain response on the University of Chicago in 1942, it was the primary concrete evidence of something long predicted in theory and a defining moment for the industry.
But whilst the age of quantum computing comes into view, it remains to be difficult to predict exactly when its impact might be felt and the way far-reaching it would be. Google claimed five years ago that it had reached “quantum supremacy” – the purpose at which a quantum computer can solve an issue that might be inconceivable for a classical machine. But latest programming techniques showed that today's supercomputers could remain competitive longer than expected. Even when the quantum age finally arrives, nearly all of computing power will still happen on silicon-based machines and only probably the most complex, specialized tasks will shift to quantum systems.
It is just not yet clear how diverse the issues might be that might be solved with this latest form of knowledge processing. Quantum machines based on the strange behavior of tiny particles are expected to be particularly useful for simulating natural subatomic processes, paving the way in which for breakthroughs in fields resembling materials science and drug discovery.
They are also expected to quickly crack today's most generally used encryption methods – increasing the urgency of a world effort to implement latest types of cryptography.
For many other things, nevertheless, it’s difficult to predict how big the leap in performance of the quantum algorithms developed thus far might be. The degree of “quantum acceleration” that might be observed, for instance, in solving complex optimization problems or accelerating machine learning, especially within the early years, remains to be controversial.
Advances in artificial intelligence could also mitigate the impact of quantum computing. Demis Hassabis, Nobel laureate and head of Google DeepMind, argues that it could soon be possible to make use of AI on a classical machine to model complex systems in nature, reducing the necessity for a quantum computer – a position supported by is disputed by many quantum experts.
Still, the advance announced by Google this week represents a big moment within the long seek for a radical latest type of computing. And even when the primary fruits of the quantum age remain confined to relatively narrow areas, they may very well be world-changing.
By 2030, Google hopes to give you the chance to construct a full-fledged quantum computer for $1 billion. Executives argue that even 10 times that quantity could be a small price to pay for a machine that would help cure cancer.
Big hopes like these have inspired researchers for a long time, encouraging a number of the world's richest tech corporations to make big and expensive bets on quantum computing. It is probably not long before their vaunted predictions can finally be put to the test.
