In his 2019 State of the Nation AddressSouth African President Cyril Ramaphosa announced that he was create a commission To the fourth industrial revolution (4IR).
The term refers to the combination of advanced digital technologies equivalent to AI and robotics in addition to automation to varied economic and social areas. The First (1760 to early 1800s), second (1870 to early 1900s) and third (Nineteen Fifties until the top of the twentieth century) Industrial revolutions were mechanical and electronic. The 4IR is characterised by the fusion of physical, digital and biological systems. It is fundamentally redesigned industriesWork and societies.
At the time, Ramaphosa admitted that the 4IR can “result in job losses”. However, he added that it will also “create many latest possibilities”:
Through this transformation we are able to construct the South Africa we would like and ensure integrative and customary growth for everybody.
Six years later, the work of the Commission achieved some results. It has to found the National Institute for Artificial Intelligence And the creation of You have hubs in key sectors equivalent to healthcare and mining.
But what do atypical South Africans see the 4IR? Global, Studies have shown That there may be a powerful gap of how people take a look at the guarantees and dangers of contemporary technological progress. The wealthy, armed with access to education and resources, see opportunities. Cross -border groups, specifically those in brackets with low incomes, fear attributable to lack of jobs and economic exclusion. Historical and cultural fears A job within the perception of individuals also mess around technology.
I’m a researcher whose work is researchingAmong other things, the interface of technology, politics and governance. I’m particularly keen on the 4IR in a South African context and recently established a study With development studies, Oliver Mtapuri, the role of the social class for the views of individuals about technological change examines.
We found that wealthier South Africans, especially those in urban areas, more optimistic about automation, artificial intelligence and other aspiring 4IR technologies than those in lower and rural communities. Racist differences were also obvious. White South Africans were 2.5 times more often that they feel comfortable with technological change than black South Africans.
These findings may help the political decision -makers to know how they will best push in South Africa to a 4IR that doesn’t deepen the prevailing inequalities. This requires integrative digital guidelines and expanded access to technology and training. Here South Africa from countries like learning could Germany And Finland.
Germany Working nationwide to equip employees with the talents which are obligatory for an increasingly digital economy. In the meantime, Finland has focused on energetic labor market policy. It combines digital training programs with progressive social welfare measures to support employees who switch between industries. Both countries have also expanded social protection by expanding unemployment advantages and offering financial support for retraining. They also ensured that gig and platform members have access to social security.
Marginalized groups left behind
Our data was taken from the Survey of South African social attitudes. It is a nationally representative survey of two,736 adults (16 years and older). We carried out a secondary evaluation of the info. The focus was on questions within the survey concerning the technological change, the fear of job shift and access to digital tools. In addition to an evaluation of the demographic data within the survey, we were capable of examine class, breed and geographical differences within the perception of automation, AI and digital transformation.
Some of a very powerful results were:
-
56% of South Africans believed that 4IR technologies would quite result in loss of labor than to jobs. Groups with lower incomes expressed the very best concern.
-
Unemployment was a very important determinant for 4IR skepticism: 63% of the unemployed interviewed felt threatened by automation, in comparison with 41% of the currently employees.
-
Only 29% of the respondents from rural areas stated that they’d regular access to the Internet. The number was 74%for urban respondents.
There are structural and historical obstacles to the economic mobility of the South Africans, access to high -quality education and participation within the digital economy.
Apartheid era guidelines Save economic differences. These are still shown in unequal access to education and infrastructure.
Rural areas today Missing reliable web connections. ((Approx. 31.18% The population of South Africa lives in rural areas.) This makes it almost not possible for people to learn from the digital economy or to contribute to the digital economy.
Many industries at the highest of automation, equivalent to B. production and agriculture are those with the very best variety of low -qualified employees. Research The international work organization emphasizes that endangered employees around the globe often lack the talents which are needed in latest labor markets. This increases the fears of the employees that the technology will replace it.
Closing the gap: guideline solutions
Brave, integrative guidelines would require to tackle these inequalities.
The South African government has to do more to extend access to technology. It already subsidizes web costs, especially schools. It has also expanded broadband networks to some under -sized areas. And it offers free programs for digital skills. The problem is that these efforts are piece by piece. A coherent national strategy is required.
Guidelines must even be developed with those which were excluded from technological progress. In this manner, you may fully take part in the digital economy – and perhaps understand and trust just a little more technology.
In practice, this might mean expanding initiatives equivalent to the National strategy for digital and future skillswho goals to equip the residents the obligatory skills to participate within the digital economy. This focuses on the event of digital skills in various sectors and communities to make sure inclusiveness and comprehensive participation.
In addition, guidelines within the municipality could support digital innovation centers equivalent to supporting Tshimologong Digital Innovation District. It offers entrepreneurs from marginalized communities training, incubation and resources, in order that they will take a wise participation within the digital economy.
Industry even have a job to play. Singapore skills in the longer term The initiative offers resources to residents to adapt to changing labor markets. This is a superb example of the cooperation between the federal government and industry. At the home, Rwanda's center for the fourth industrial revolution (C4ir) brings “government, industry, civil society and science together to check, test and refine political framework and governance protocols that maximize the benefits of latest technologies”.
The 4IR has the potential to vary South Africa. However, this may only occur if its benefits are shared fairly amongst all residents. Innovation doesn’t need to be reinvented as an instrument for consolidating prosperity and privileges, but as a method of making a more integrative society.
