I’m a writing professor who sees artificial intelligence as a chance for college students than as a threat.
This distinguishes me from a few of my colleagues who fear that AI accelerates a flood of superficial content, hinders critical considering and hindered creative expression. They fear that the scholars simply out of mere laziness or, worse, to cheat.
Perhaps so many students are subsequently afraid to make use of them to make use of Chatgpt.
In the New Yorker The magazine, the historian D. Graham Burnett, tells of his students and doctoral students in Princeton whether or not they had ever used chatt. Nobody raised hand.
“It's not that dishonest,” he writes. “It's like you might be paralyzed.”
The students appear to be internalized that the usage of AI is someway incorrect for his or her course work. But whether my colleagues prefer it or not, most college students use it.
A report in February 2025 from the University Policy Institute In Great Britain, 92% of the university students stopped in any type of AI. Already in August 2023-only nine months after the publication of chatt-more than half of the primary student of the primary yr of Kennesaw State University, the general public research institution wherein I informed, she reported that they believed this AI is the long run of writing.
It is obvious that the scholars don't magically use AI. I feel it will be significant to indicate some options for a way AI can actually be a great tool that improves the writing process relatively than hampers.
Help with the occupied
A February 2025 Open report At Chatgpt, the usage of users in college age found that greater than 1 / 4 of their chatt talks were educated.
The report also showed that the five best uses for college students were centered: starting papers and projects (49%); Summary of long texts (48%); Brainstorming creative projects (45%); Explore recent topics (44%); and revision letter (44%).
These figures query the idea that the scholars only use AI to cheat or write entire papers.
Instead, it indicates that they use AI to free more time for deeper processes and Metacognitive behaviors – Certainly organize ideas, improve arguments and refiner styles.
If AI enables the scholars to automate routine cognitive tasks – reminiscent of receiving information behavior or insurance that’s consistent – this doesn’t mean that they think less. It implies that your considering changes.
Of course, the scholars can abuse AI in the event that they use the technology passively and accept their results and concepts reflexors. And overwriting on chatt can undermine the unique voice or type of a student.
As long as the scholars learn the best way to use AI intentionally, this shift might be seen as a chance as a loss.
Clarification of the creative vision
It has also turn out to be clear that whether it is used responsibly, AI can increase human creativity.
For example Science Comedy Writer Sarah Rose Siskind recently gave a lecture with Harvard students About her creative process. She spoke about how she uses Chatgpt to create Brainstorming -Witz -Setups and explore various comedic scenarios that enable her to pay attention, create punch line and refine her comedic timing.
Note how Siskin used AI in a way that didn’t replace human touch. Instead of replacing her creativity, AI reinforced her with structured and consistent feedback, which gave her more time for the polish of her jokes.
Another example is that Rhetorical start -up methodWhat I developed along with other Kennesaw State University researchers. It was developed for college students and adult learners and is a framework for talking to a AI chat bot that emphasizes the importance of the agency for the management of AI results.
If authors use a precise language to demand critical considering to reflect on it, and deliberate revision with entrances and outputs, they guide AI to generate content that matches their vision.
There remains to be a process
The rhetorical start -up method reflects best practice in LitigationWhat encourages the writers to rethink, refine and revise their designs.
However, the usage of chatt is about rethinking and revising the requests and expenses.
Suppose a student desires to create a convincing PSA for social media to advertise the composting of the campus. She looks at her audience. She asks Chatgpt to design a brief, optimistic message in under 50 words which can be aimed toward College students.
When she reads the primary edition, she notices that resulting from the shortage of urgency. Therefore, she revises the request to emphasise immediate effects. It also adds some additional details which can be necessary to your message, e.g. B. the situation of an information meeting. The last PSA is:
“Every scrap counts! Today within the campus composting with the commons. Your leftovers should not garbage – you might be the gardens of tomorrow. Help our university to bloom brighter, a compost tank each.”
The rhetorical start -up method is just not groundbreaking. It's riffing In a process This has been tested within the discipline of the writing studies for many years. But I discovered that it really works by instructing writers the best way to intentionally demand.
I do know that because we asked users about their experiences. In Loose studiesMy colleagues and I interviewed 133 individuals who used the rhetorical request method for his or her academic and skilled writing:
-
92% stated that it helped them to guage the collection of writing before and through their process.
-
75% stated that they were able to take care of their authentic voice and at the identical time could use the AI support.
-
89% replied that it helped them to think critically about their writing.
The data indicate that the learners take their letter seriously. Your answers show that you simply are fastidiously desirous about your writing styles and methods. While this data is temporary, we proceed to gather answers in various courses, disciplines and learning environments.
All of which means that, although there are different perspectives, when and where it is cheap to make use of AI that students will definitely use them. And receiving with a frame can enable you think more about your letter.
So AI is just not only a tool that is beneficial for trivial tasks. It might be an enrichment for creativity. When today's students – the AI actively use to jot down, revise and explore ideas – to see AI as a writing partner, I feel that it’s a very good idea for professors to take into consideration whether or not they have the most effective ways to work with it.
