In the run-up to the votes of the US Senate about President Donald Trump from the US Senate Expenses and tax billThe Republicans tried to revise the legislative template to be able to win the support of fluctuating GOP senators. A provision contained in the unique law was a 10-year moratorium for each state law that wanted to control artificial intelligence. The provision refused access to 500 million US dollars in federal financing for broadband web and infrastructure projects for each state that passed such a law.
The admission of the AI regulatory moratorium was widely considered a profit For AI corporations that had expressed fears that states that passed the regulations for AI would hinder the event of technology. Many federal and state officials of each parties, including General prosecutorsPresent State legislator And 17 Republican governorspublicly against the measure.
In the last hours before the Senate law was adopted depressed The determination by a powerful votes of 99-1. In one era defined by Partisan, partly on topics similar to B. immigrationPresent Health carePresent Social well -beingPresent Gender equalityPresent Racial relationships And Gun controlWhy are so many republican and democratic political leaders on the identical side on the query of AI regulation?
Whatever the legislator motivated to enable AI regulation, our latest survey shows that they’re Aligned with nearly all of the Americans Consider the AI with fear, skepticism and fear and who wish to have regulated the emerging technology.
Non -partisan feelings
We are Political scientist Who uses Surveys for studying Partisan polarization In the United States and within the areas of the agreement that bridge the gap that the US policy has defined. In April 2025 we used A National representative survey This tried to understand what Americans take into consideration AI, including what AI will mean for the economy and society in the longer term.
The public is mostly pessimistic. We found that 65% of the Americans imagine that AI will increase the spread of misinformation. Six -fifty percent of the Americans fear that AI will endanger the longer term of humanity. Less than 3 out of 10 Americans informed us that AI would make them more productive (29%), people less lonely (21%) or improve the economy (22%).
While the Americans are inclined to be divided into most topics, the priority concerning the effects of the AI on the longer term in relation to Republicans and Democrats appears to be relatively consistent. For example, only 19% of Republicans and 22% of Democrats stated that artificial intelligence will make people less lonely. In terms of their views, the respondents within the parties are agreed with only 29% – each Republicans and Democrats – in relation to their views. And 60% of Democrats and 53% of Republicans imagine that AI will threaten the longer term of humanity.
In the query of whether artificial intelligence must be strictly regulated by the federal government, we found that nearly 6 out of 10 Americans (58%) comply with this mood. Given the Partisan differences To support the state regulation of the corporate, we expected this query to seek out partisan classification. However, our data states that Democrats and Republicans are of thoughts by way of AI regulation, with the majorities of each the Democrats (66%) and Republicans (54%) support strict AI regulation.
If we take demographic and political characteristics similar to breed, level of education, gender identity, income, ideology and age, we again find that the partisan identity has no significant influence on the opinion of regulating AI.
Condition of fear
In the approaching years, the controversy about AI and the role of the federal government will probably be in each Condition and federal level. How each day seems to bring New progress In the flexibility and reach of AI, the longer term is developing into one during which people coexist next to AI – and hopefully thrive. This latest reality has rightly nervous the American public, each Democrats and Republicans, and our surveys captures this widespread fear.
Legislators and technology leaders could address this fear through higher communication of the pitfalls and potential of the AI and take the general public concerns seriously. After all, the general public is just not alone in its fear. Many experts on this area even have considerable worries About the longer term of AI.
One of the fundamental political questions that move in the longer term will then be to what extent the regulatory authorities present these emerging and transformative technology to guard the Americans from the negative consequences of the AI.
