Let's talk in regards to the European Championship. Not the little innocent hyphen, not his more self -confident cousin, the dash. No, I speak of the 'Em -Dash', so long, dramatic line that Ki -Loooooowes should fall in your sentences as if it were paid for professional dash. Seriously, it’s the AI version of Jazz Hands.
You may not notice it, but most others do it. It is the dead giveaway that you simply let your favorite robot buddy placed on your words in Ki Drag, and like a foul wig within the third act of, it may possibly … a bit an excessive amount of. Let me set the scene: you write your team a warm email. Something vulnerable, perhaps even raw: “I assumed lots about how we work together – and the way we could be higher – not only as a colleague, but as humans.”
Except waiting. You didn't write this sentence, Ai did it. They just wanted it to repair a typo and perhaps increase the sound, but now it is stuffed with EM lines, introspective pace and strangely placed poetic breaks. They were officially “EM-Marked”.
What is the EM brand for AI?
The EM -Dash is the long horizontal line ( -), which is usually used as an alternative of commas, colons, brackets or occasionally dramatic break. It's just like the Swiss army knife of punctuation, and Ai loves it.
AI is obsessive about EM stitches, as is obsessive about gen z of Y2K fashion; It is confusing, strangely stylish and borderline after they are overused. But here is the kicker: AI uses them like sprinkles on the cupcake of a toddler. Even if it will not be appropriate. Even when you say: “No sprinkles, please.”
I literally typed AI: “Please remove the lines.” And what do I come back? “Have it!” Followed by:
“This is an excellent probability – one who demands urgency – and clarity – for optimum effects.” Thanks, Gpt. You removed exactly zero.
So how do you sound human (but still use Ai)?
Despite the Dash drama, I’m not here to let you know that you need to throw away AI completely. AI is good in polishing them from the mental path, implementing them and getting them out. But like a toddler with glitter glue, you continue to have to watch it.
Here are three actual tricks to be certain that your communication continues to be listening, not HAL 9000 with a journalism degree.
1. Human first draft, Robot second
Always, and I at all times mean, write the primary draft itself. Let it’s chaotic, tipproof, emotionally chaotic and uncomfortably honest. That gives your voice the fingerprints.
Let the AI repair it, reorganize and suggest a greater river, but not beforehand. Ai cannot guess what they meant in the event that they don't give it first with which they’ll work with him. Otherwise, it only serves a superbly interrupted bowl of oatmeal with the emotional depth of a DMV form book. Imagine it: You are the cook, AI is just your unusual sous boss with a tiny top hat. They say what they do. You don't let it invent the recipe.
2. Grate the EMS (and other AI told)
As soon as Ai gives you your best version, you rip apart as when you are working on a script a few talking golden retriever who writes blogs.
Seek:
- Em strokes (obviously)
- The expression “in today's fast -moving world” (AIS favorite opening line)
- Overuse of rhetorical questions
- Repetitive alliteration (AI really finds it clever)
Make a “find and replace” for ” -” if you have got to. Replace them with commas, periods or, forbid God, actual breaks within the thought. Your sound can be humanized immediately. When her sentence appears like he’s telling Morgan Freeman in a natural documentary film, he might be too AI ISH.
3. Add the “you” back in
Read it again after polishing. Read it loudly. Ask yourself:
- Would I say that loudly on the brunch?
- Does that sound like me or a guest columnist because he tried an excessive amount of?
- Have I by chance quoted Tony Robbins?
If it feels too stiff or polished, loosen it and add a small slang. Break a grammar rule, use sentence fragments, write the way you speak when you’re three mimoses deep, and provides your best friend of the friend. That is the key sauce.
Example:
AI version: “Let us explore revolutionary solutions to extend our business route.”
Your version: “Let us learn how we are able to stop turning our bikes and really growing this thing.”
Feel the difference?
Why you need to still use AI, even when she likes her greater than socially acceptable
AI will not be the enemy, it’s her worker, her co-author, her above-average intern, who drank an excessive amount of espresso and got here back with a model of 1,200 words for a brunch flyer.
Use it to:
- Pull your message
- Help with structure and flow
- Make your writing pop when you’re fried with brain
- Get a blank-page syndrome without crying
Just don't let it’s the one voice within the room. Imagine this as routinely, helpful if it is correct, funny whether it is flawed and dangerous when you aren’t careful.
If your message appears like it is a component of an op-ET, but you simply attempt to send your VA via a podcast time by email, to take a step back, kill the European Championship strings, to regain your strange little voice, and remember: AI doesn’t replace it, it only makes it sound 12% intelligently.
Now proceed, edit like an individual, delete like a wild and send them with boast. (And please, analogous to the love of all things, remove the European Championship strings.)
