What is your convincing dream scenario for AI – a breakthrough that may fundamentally improve life at a world level?
My convincing dream scenario for AI is a AI-controlled leap within the biosciences, which enables medicine that is actually preventive for all and in all places, which is liable for most global deaths and long-term illnesses.
I imagine that AI models speed up the invention of diagnostics and preventive treatments with a ultra-low price by decrypted the earliest biological markers of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, respiratory diseases and diabetes-years before the symptoms. AI could model complex interactions between genetics, environment and lifestyle in huge, diverse populations and reveal prevention paths that we cannot yet see.
This would result in inexpensive vaccines, precision food interventions and easy, scalable therapeutic agents that were developed for settings with low resources to be sure that prevention isn’t a privilege of the rich nations, but a normal of care worldwide.
Such a breakthrough could change the trajectory of world health and reduce the stress on health systems, extend healthy lifespan and stop hundreds of thousands of avoidable deaths yearly.
What is a current project or a breakthrough that you simply are particularly pleased with – and what sort of effects, what effects it should have in the true world?
I’m proud to develop the strategic Ki-Governance & Leadership program for SMB boards and C-suites into the backbone of economies worldwide. Too often the conversation about AI is dominated by large firms, but KMBS are the true growth engine in most countries. This program is meant to enable your managers to make AI a strategic advantage with the knowledge, the framework and trust. It focuses on the sensible government, the responsible introduction and the orientation with long -term business objectives, in order that SMEs can transcend isolated experiments beyond initiatives that provide a measurable value.
I hope that it helps SMEs to compete in all places on a bigger stage, speed up innovations and strengthen the economic and social structure of their communities.
What is an application for AI that you simply consider that more people should know – something positive that flies under the radar?
A robust but often missed use of AI is to make high-quality educational and digital skills training universally accessible and to shut the gap between those who can fully take part in the digital economy and those that cannot. AI can adapt to the pace, language and context of every individual and supply personalized instructions for the whole lot, from fundamental literacy to advanced technical skills – also in communities with limited availability or resources from teachers.
By democratizing access to learning, KI has the potential to bring entire regions into the fashionable economy, to equip the subsequent generation of managers and to be sure that technological progress advantages everyone, not only the digital privileged.
If you could have to decide on a nightmare scenario that keeps you awake at night – whether realistic or speculative – what wouldn’t it be and which warning signs should we take a look at today?
What keeps me up to this point is the extensive gap between the builders – the boundaries of increasingly powerful technology – and the lawyers: firms, governments and residents who either lack understanding to challenge it or make decisions by convenient with the clients. If this happens, ethics, people and governance risk are treated as a subsequent idea.
My deeper concern is the upcoming generations z, gen alpha and those that develop into consequences-who will inherit the long-term consequences of today without full knowledge or expected decisions. If we allow the technological dynamics to be exceeded in regards to the well -founded, fundamental leadership, we risk that you could have designed a worldwide worldwide world and never by conscious decision.
Who or what do you think that has the strength to stop your nightmare scenario above?
The prevention of this scenario requires a well -founded, responsible management in any respect levels – in business, government and civil society. Boards and C suites must construct real AI alphabetization in order that they’ll query, guide and rule technological decisions as an alternative of simply supporting the development company's agenda. The governments must define clear, enforceable framework conditions that bring about innovations with ethics and public interest.
Likewise, the builders themselves are liable for embedding transparency, security and long-term effects into their work as a compliance exercise, but as a central measure of success. The strongest protection will probably be the cooperation between these groups, with common incentives to align AI's trajectory more to human and social advantages than the short -term profit.
What are we not talking about within the AI ​​discussion today – something that you simply consider that it might be very vital in five years?
We don’t talk enough in regards to the energy balance of AI – not only in regards to the environmental costs for training and running of ever larger models, but additionally the strategic effects of who controls the energy supply that supplies it. Like AI skills, the demand for calculation and thus electricity also scale. In five years, energy availability, the prices and resilience could develop into a critical competitive factor – which determine which countries, firms and municipalities can fully take part in the AI ​​economy.
If we now ignore this, we risk a brand new type of digital gap, wherein access to AI is restricted by access to inexpensive, reliable energy. The winners will probably be those that develop AI systems and infrastructures with a view to be more radically energy-efficient to diversify their energy sources and to integrate the introduction of AI into broader strategies for sustainability and energy safety. This isn’t only a climate problem – it's about stability, justice and sovereignty of the KI -era.
If you look ahead for 10 years, what do you think that will probably be the largest change in our day by day life?
When I look ahead for ten years, I believe that the best change in our day by day life will probably be how much healthier we’re – and the way long we will still expect to live well. AI has already began to release discoveries in diagnostics, drug development, personalized prevention and early detection, which were once considered inconceivable or a long time away.
In a decade, I see the health predicted and more personalized, with interventions which are tailored to every of us long before the disease has taken. This shift couldn’t only be expanded to live for years, but additionally increases quality in these years – more time, energy and potential for work, creativity and connection. The real breakthrough will probably be when these benefits reach people in all places, not only in essentially the most developed markets.
Do you think that agi is close? When will we have now AGI?
I used to be inspired to hitch this AI summit to focus on a message that I consider that it is crucial: governance and innovation must bring hand in hand. Without this balance, we risk either slowing progress or eroding trust.
For me, it is usually about combining with managers in industries, learning from different perspectives and expanding our collective understanding of what’s ahead of us. AI develops at an exceptional speed, and never a single organization or a single country has all of the answers. Summit like this creates the space to share insights, to challenge our assumptions and to explore together how we will guide AI in a way that serves each progress and humans.
08 – 09 October 2025
Taets Art & Event Park, Amsterdam
Worldsummit.ai
09 – December 10, 2025
Doha exhibition and congress center
