HomeEventsJuliet Macdowell on ethics, effects and the longer term of social AI

Juliet Macdowell on ethics, effects and the longer term of social AI

What is your convincing dream scenario for AI – a breakthrough that might fundamentally improve life at a world level?

My convincing dream: AI as a universal public infrastructure, which makes high -quality health care accessible to everyone, all over the place through diagnostics, translation and care coordination. At the identical time, it eliminates repeating work and distributes the productivity gains, which lies a 3 -day working week with a deal with creativity, care and community. This just isn’t utopian

It is a political decision to profit from AI more for people than for profit.

What is a current project or a breakthrough that you just are particularly pleased with – and how much effects, what effects it’ll have in the actual world?

I’m particularly pleased with passenger. His name means “bridge” what exactly realizes what he does: mix the connection of French administrative services to the migrants who rely on them. It is a AI system that reinforces human interpreters as a substitute of replacing them to make sure confidentiality, empathy and cultural nuances in health care, legal processes and social services. The influence is each personally and systemic. For individuals, this implies less misunderstandings and more dignity in endangered moments. For institutions it shows how AI can strengthen human connection as a substitute of undermining them.

What is an application for AI that you just imagine that more people should know – something positive that flies under the radar?

AI can do greater than a debunk lie. It can defend the reality. Our prototype-clear initiative shows how AI pursue extremist rhetoric in real time and counteracts emotionally resonant stories with fact-based, emotionally resonant stories. But the deeper opportunity is the essential causes: fear, resentment, isolation. If we use AI to discover these signals and react with dignity and connection, we reduce the attractiveness of hate before metastasis. This is about constructing narrative infrastructure for democracy and never leaving the data space to those that dismiss him.

If you’ve gotten to decide on a nightmare scenario that keeps you awake at night – whether realistic or speculative – what would it not be and which warning signs should we take a look at today?

That we ignore the environmental fee of AI until it is simply too late. Training and running large models are already consuming amazing amounts of energy and water, with warning signs all over the place: requirements of the ballooning data center, rising emissions and hidden costs for endangered communities. The nightmare becomes indispensable when accelerating the climate slump. We now need radical alternatives: economical architectures, decentralized micromodels, renewable calculation and nature-inspired designs. AI has to grow to be an engine of sustainability, not a driver of the collapse.

Who or what do you think that has the strength to forestall your nightmare scenario above?

It can’t be left to the tech giant. Big Ai Labs and Cloud providers don’t regulate themselves if their business model relies on the size. Governments must impose environmental standards with the identical seriousness as for transport and energy. Civil society must end transparency and the Greenwashing from data center. As builders, we have now to reject “Bigger is best” and the usual construction of AI which might be economical, ethically and renewable. Responsibility is collectively, however the accountability requires with most who profit essentially the most.

What are we not talking about within the AI ​​discussion today – something that you just imagine that it might be very vital in five years?

We are obsessive about models and benchmarks and ignore the narrative infrastructure: how AI shapes stories, beliefs and culture. In five years, the best risks usually are not technical failures, but narrative control. Without protective measures and public alternatives, the identical engines dominate the residents' life. Here the actual power struggle will develop.

If you look ahead for 10 years, what do you think that might be the most important change in our day by day life?

AI will shape invisible infrastructure, health care, justice and education. The critical query just isn’t technical, but political: will institutions use the profits of AI for universal care, shorter work weeks and use a stronger bourgeois life, or will they concentrate wealth and deepen inequality? Our biggest challenge might be that AI serves more human than division.

Do you think that agi is close? When will we have now AGI?

I got here to issue a call for motion: We must coden for the longer term by which we would like to live. Mission AI shows this with passenger defended, donation procurement that offers NGOs more time for effects and defended the reality in the size. My message is urgent: AI can remove trust or increase solidarity. It is quickly closed to pick windows.

08 – 09 October 2025

Taets Art & Event Park, Amsterdam

09 – December 10, 2025

Doha exhibition and congress center

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read