From ancient slavery to the factory floor, progress was often based on the exploitation of individuals. We might prefer to imagine that those days are long behind us. But within the digital age, AI and the metaverse risk repeating this pattern with latest types of invisible labor and inequality.
Ridley Scott's 2000 film Gladiator told the story of Maximus Decimus Meridius, a betrayed Roman general who becomes enslaved and must fight as a gladiator to entertain the Roman elite. The sequel offered a brand new perspective on cycles of exploitation and the struggle for dignity.
Both movies reflect modern types of servitude. These stories remain troublingly relevant today because the metaverse, AI, and the digital economy reshape work dynamics.
As AI takes over key logistics and procurement processes, latest blind spots may emerge. For example, AI tools used to observe efficiency and productivity can be misused to micro-manage employees. A Investigation 2022 found that eight of the ten largest U.S. employers use AI to trace employee productivity, particularly in low-wage digital jobs.
Then there are the low-wage staff who moderate online content and protect Metaverse users from harmful material. Research has shown that moderators can suffer from anxiety, depression, nightmares, fatigue and panic attacks when exposed to disturbing content. This may include images and videos of kid abuse and violence, in addition to cruelty and degradation.
Another study revealed how content moderators in places just like the Philippines, India, Mexico and Silicon Valley suffer from psychological trauma, exploitative contracts and an absence of protection. In this case, firms are effectively outsourcing the psychological burden of this work. While it's true that higher-income countries employ fewer moderators, most content moderation is outsourced Low-wage regions.
And while AI may help flag and filter harmful content, Research shows that manual content moderation stays critical in immersive environments.
Nwz/Shutterstock
The metaverse is commonly praised as an area for creativity, freedom and latest economic opportunities. Big tech firms promise users the power to construct virtual worlds, take part in decentralized economies and redefine their work-life balance. But again, this vision obscures the potential exploitation inherent in these systems.
Consider the rise of “play-to-earn” gaming platforms, where users earn cryptocurrencies or digital assets by playing games. Although it seems empowering, it often relies on work marginalized regions where players hope to make a living but find yourself incurring financial losses.
These can arise from the initial expenses required to play. This makes them actors in name only, as they participate out of economic necessity.
Another practice in virtual economies is “gold farming”. This has its origins in so-called “Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games” and includes “Worker-Player” repeatedly performing monotonous in-game tasks, referred to as “grinding.” This generates virtual currencies or items which can be then sold for real money to higher-income “recreational gamers.”
Gold farming operations are typically carried out in low-income countries, where blue-collar players put in long hours for meager pay, while wealthier players profit from purchasing the virtual goods and services.
In the Metaverse, this practice is evolving into large-scale digital labor, where staff grow virtual goods in gigantic conditions without protection, advantages, or fair wages.
However, empirical research on these types of digital work stays limited, though these systems are evolving at a remarkable pace.
Entertainment and Ethics
The metaverse cannot exist with out a vast material supply chain. Take, for instance, the employees who endure harsh conditions to supply the hardware that powers them. Mining of earth metals, that are crucial for electronic devices reminiscent of VR headsets, is commonly linked to exploitative labor practices.
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) Accounts for It has greater than 50% of the world's cobalt reserves and is the second largest copper producer on the earth. But first-hand reports show miners working in shafts as much as 100 meters deep without safety protection. Workers, including children, risk their lives in dangerous conditions for minimal wages.
The demand for critical minerals is increasing. The International Energy Agency has predicted that demand for cobalt, lithium, nickel and copper could triple or multiply by 2050. To meet this demand, greater than 350 latest mines could also be required by 2035, increasing concerns about human rights.
The metaverse guarantees wealthy user experiences, but in addition increases the danger of exploitation. The associated escapism often comes on the expense of invisible staff trapped in unequal systems. The growing number of individuals serving it actually deserves more attention Regulators, trade unions and authorities.
However, the metaverse also represents latest and unique things Challenges for regulation because there aren’t any physical boundaries. This makes this tougher fragmented, decentralized governance and the speed of its development.
But there are signs of progress. governments are Revise regulations to implement ethical labor practices in supply chains. And those of the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence PolicyThe law, passed in July 2024, represents a vital step in holding firms accountable for human rights violations.
Likewise the United Kingdom Modern Slavery Statement requires firms to do more to discover and mitigate forced labor risks of their supply chains. However, because the metaverse continues to evolve, Regulatory framework can have to adapt quickly.
Exploitation in work systems isn’t latest, however the forms it takes in digital environments might be harder to detect and easier to scale. That's why it's necessary to keep watch over these emerging dynamics.
The metaverse has the potential to democratize access to information, connections and opportunities. But their foundations have to be free from the stain of exploitation.
We are all spectators and experience above all of the convenience of the top user experience. But how different are we from the group that cheered the gladiators within the Colosseum? In ancient Rome, suffering was visible but neglected; In the digital world, it could be easier to look the opposite way. The answer lies in regulation, accountability and a collective commitment to be sure that historical atrocities are usually not repeated within the digital age.
