Unlock Editor's Digest without spending a dime
Roula Khalaf, editor of the FT, picks her favorite stories on this weekly newsletter.
Interviews are stuffed with opportunities for humiliation. Who wants to explain their biggest weakness to a bunch of colleagues? Or feel like a contestant on a quiz show with brain teasers like “How many golf balls slot in a Boeing 747?” Unfortunately for job seekers, the chatter is increasingly getting uncontrolled.
The demands of hiring committees within the tech sector are increasing. That means more interviews, but additionally more technical tests. Along with coding reviews come requests for essays, lengthy take-home tasks, and even days of labor with existing teams. A friend from the Bay Area endured several rounds of interviews and was finally presented with the ultimate challenge of “maintaining” the corporate’s leadership. There were no further instructions. She didn't get the job.
Recruiters will say that this will not be happening to make life difficult for job seekers, but since it is becoming increasingly difficult to seek out the precise candidates. The blame lies with the job seekers themselves. Online advertisements make it easy to submit unsolicited applications. In the UK, the Institute of Student Employers reported that a record 1.2 million applications were received this 12 months for 17,000 graduate vacancies. Human resources software maker Workday reports that the number of worldwide applications is growing 4 times faster than the variety of open positions.
This surplus includes those candidates who log in to the AI chatbot ChatGPT to customize their application with skills they could not possess. Some even attempt to trick recruiting software by listing requirements they lack in white font, making them invisible to the human eye but picked up by the screening software.
From the employer's perspective, it due to this fact is sensible to present the candidates latest challenges. AI-powered job applications can hide bad candidates whose failings are revealed over multiple interviews. And the personable and smooth speaker who sails through face-to-face meetings may be undone by on-site testing or work trials.
In some corporations, being good at your job isn't enough. You have to be committed to the corporate ethos. Amazon is understood for evaluating candidates based on its 16 leadership principles. If you don't exhibit your customer obsession or your ability to think big, you'll find yourself back on the job market.
The problem is that adding more interviews and tests exhausts candidates and interviewers and takes everyone's time away from actual work. If the news is even worse, they could not even be productive. In 2016, Google stated that 4 interviews were enough to predict whether someone needs to be hired. According to the corporate, anything beyond that had diminishing returns.
However, this rule doesn’t keep in mind the barriers put up before interviews. Young job seekers sometimes complain that their parents still consider it is feasible to placed on a pleasant suit and hand a resume to the front desk when on the lookout for a job. In reality, the usual process already includes a web-based application, resume screening and online assessment before on-site meetings happen. Application tracking software like Oracle's Taleo is used to filter out candidates before they’ve a likelihood to interact with anyone in an organization. Rejected applicants may be hosted.
As the method expands, the time needed to secure a job also increases. Research by US human resources consultant Josh Bersin found that the typical is 45 days. In areas like technology it might probably take for much longer. Software engineer Rohit Verma has blogged about his experiences securing positions at major US technology corporations. At Meta he writes that it took approx 4 months From the suggestion to the job offer.
This can be more encouraging if it weren't for the tech sector's newfound penchant for mass layoffs. The sector shed an estimated 264,000 staff last 12 months after a hiring boom in the course of the pandemic, in response to crowdsourcing website Layoffs.fyi. So far this 12 months, corporations like TikTok and Snap have cut over 149,000 jobs. This implies that some employees who participated in these intensive interviews are actually unemployed.
Where technology leads, other sectors are inclined to follow. Expect the hiring process to turn out to be harder in your individual line of labor soon.
The excellent news is that there’s at all times an exception. Sometimes getting a job may be as easy as sending a tweet. In 2019, a 28-year-old Brit was put in command of Tesla's social media after he posted an image of an enormous ram with the caption “Look at this absolute unit.” Still, following Elon Musk proved no more foolproof than another hiring approach. Within a 12 months, the social media manager had left the position.
