Meta isn't the one company grappling with the rise of AI-generated content and its impact on the platform. YouTube also quietly rolled out a policy change in June that enables users to request the removal of AI-generated or other synthetic content that simulates their face or voice. The change allows users to request the removal of one of these AI content through YouTube's privacy request process. It's an extension of the previously announced approach for a responsible AI agenda first presented in November.
Instead of demanding that the content be removed since it is misleading, like a deepfake, YouTube wants affected parties to request the removal of the content directly as a privacy violation. According to the recently updated Help documentation on this topic: It requires first-party claims, aside from a handful of exceptions, corresponding to when the person is a minor, doesn’t have access to a pc, is deceased, or other such exceptions.
However, simply submitting a removal request doesn’t necessarily mean that the content shall be removed. YouTube notes that it’s going to evaluate the grievance itself based on a variety of aspects.
For example, it could check whether the content is revealed to be synthetic or created using AI, whether it clearly identifies a person, and whether the content might be considered parody, satire, or anything of value and public interest. The company also notes that it could check whether the AI ​​content encompasses a public figure or other well-known person, and whether that person displays “sensitive behavior” corresponding to criminal activity, violence, or support for a product or political candidate. The latter is especially concerning in an election yr, as AI-generated recommendations could potentially influence votes.
YouTube also gives the uploader of the content 48 hours to answer the grievance. If the content is removed before that deadline, the grievance is closed. Otherwise, YouTube will initiate a review. The company also warns users that removal will mean the entire removal of the video from the positioning and, where applicable, the removal of the person's name and private information from the video's title, description, and tags. Users may also blur the faces of individuals of their videos, but they can’t simply set the video to non-public to comply with the removal request, because the video might be reverted back to public status at any time.
However, the corporate didn’t make the policy change widely known. In March a tool was introduced in Creator Studio, which allowed developers to reveal when realistic-looking content was created using altered or synthetic media, including generative AI. More recently, began testing a function which might enable users to Crowdsourced notes that provide additional context about videos, corresponding to whether it’s a parody or whether it’s misleading in any way.
YouTube will not be against the usage of AI, as the corporate itself has already experimented with generative AI, including with a comment summarizer and a conversation tool to ask questions on a video or get recommendations. However, the corporate has previously warned that simply labelling AI content as such doesn’t necessarily protect it from removal, because it must still comply with YouTube's Community Guidelines.
In the event of privacy complaints regarding AI materials, YouTube is not going to immediately penalize the unique creator of the content.
“If you might be an creator and receive a privacy grievance notification, do not forget that privacy violations are usually not the identical as community guideline violations, and receiving a privacy grievance doesn’t robotically lead to a strike,” an organization representative said last month. divided on the YouTube community site, where the corporate informs creators directly about recent policies and features.
In other words: YouTube Privacy Policy differ from his Community Guidelinesand a few content could also be faraway from YouTube in response to a privacy request, even when it doesn't violate its Community Guidelines. While the corporate doesn't impose a penalty, corresponding to an upload limit, when a creator's video is removed following a privacy grievance, YouTube tells us it could take motion against accounts with repeat violations.
