Unlock Editor's Digest free of charge
FT editor Roula Khalaf selects her favourite stories on this weekly newsletter.
A standard criticism of regulators within the tech world is that they’re at all times fighting the last war. Markets move too fast for slow antitrust investigations and litigation to make much difference.
This grievance will soon be put to the test in the unreal intelligence market, which has been in turmoil because the launch of ChatGPT. A US court's ruling that gave Google an illegal monopoly on web search is barely every week old, but there are already strong similarities in the way in which competition within the AI field is evolving. Will the search ruling influence the evolution of the market?
This week, Google unveiled its first true AI voice assistant, called Gemini Live. Designed as a natural-sounding conversational interface, assistants like this one could at some point be the most important way people interact with smartphones. Instead of pulling up a search engine or opening an app, you’ll be able to just confer with the phone to seek out information or get things done.
Gemini Live is the primary to market, but OpenAI has already unveiled an analogous service. Given their potential importance, it is rather likely that each major technology company will want such a service.
In the approaching battle for attention between these AI assistants, distribution can be key. Reaching as large an audience as possible is prone to have powerful, self-reinforcing advantages. AI services improve the more they’re used, as they learn from users' prompts. This reflects the important thing lesson within the case of Google Search: paying for the highest spot on many mobile phones gave Google a bonus of scale. Once it was in a position to suck up huge amounts of user data, no other search engine stood a likelihood.
Competition on this recent market is just not evolving in the identical way. Apple has opted against the massive investments required to compete within the search space, selecting as a substitute to rake in $20 billion a yr by making Google the default in its Safari browser. But in the case of AI, the corporate has taken a special tack. While it doesn't have a full-fledged AI model to compete with Gemini, it has set its sights on using Siri as a voice interface for the iPhone, and directing users to ChatGPT (and eventually other chatbots) for more AI-powered responses to queries.
But for upstarts like OpenAI, the parallels with the evolution of the search market are still frightening. Google announced this week that it could integrate Gemini into its Android mobile operating system, potentially allowing it to succeed in about 70 percent of smartphone users.
For the corporate's competitors, it could be some consolation that the antitrust case against Microsoft twenty years ago helped curb the corporate's more aggressive competitive instincts.
Back then, Internet search was a brand new market and Google was the upstart trying to achieve a foothold there. Microsoft could have used its then-dominant Internet Explorer browser and Windows operating system to advertise its own search service and displace Google. But under pressure after the corporate was found to have acted illegally to take care of its Windows monopoly, it held back and gave Google room to thrive.
Will it’s the identical with AI, and can Google think twice before using the identical tactics that were just made illegal? AI will definitely be within the highlight to an extent that it hasn't been before. But there are necessary differences.
For example, the US only concluded that Google, but not Android, had an illegal monopoly within the search sector, and thus had greater room for maneuver (the EU had, nonetheless, initiated antitrust proceedings against the mobile operating system).
The decisive factor can be how Google decides how deeply Gemini can be integrated into Android and the way much leeway can be given to cell phone manufacturers to integrate other AI assistants. This weekit was said All Android users could run Gemini as an “overlay” on top of other apps, essentially providing a further layer of intelligence to whatever they're doing. Once embedded within the operating system, Gemini could change into an integral a part of Android phones, making it difficult for competing assistants to achieve a foothold.
How the US search engine case against Google is set could play a giant role within the final result. Rather than simply attempting to bring competition back to the search engine market, the judge could also try to forestall Google from dominating newer markets. Splitting off Android and forcing the corporate to offer competitors access to the information used to coach its AI models are two of the solutions being called for by the corporate's critics.
Remedies have yet to be decided, and appeals will inevitably follow, however the legal battle over Google's old monopoly could still play a very important role in the long run of the technology.
